<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CS4 &#8211; New tapeless workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://poweredproduction.com/tech/cs4-new-tapeless-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://poweredproduction.com/tech/cs4-new-tapeless-workflow/</link>
	<description>We are a production blog that focuses on bringing you what it takes to make media that matters.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 04:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://poweredproduction.com/tech/cs4-new-tapeless-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 02:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poweredproduction.com/?p=47#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I can see the Chicken &amp; Egg dynamic in full effect - but RED does have the API working in their favor - it seems that they have Avid (and eventually FCP) going to be able to cut R3D natively (eventually) and I agree one is point less and the other over priced (You decide which!)  I do however - really wish that they would at least acknowledge it in print. 

I guess the really funny thing that came to me - is the reality that this is all in the hope that I can actually afford the Scarlet when it comes down the pipe. It would give me some sort of peace to know that I could cut it if I could afford it!  But with the shake up over at RED and these new camera (5DmkII and D90) coming of age - the only thing that is clear, &quot;NAB IS GOING TO ROCK THIS YEAR!&quot;  

PaulDV and I were talking before &quot;Hero&#039;s&quot; started - Stu brings up some really good food for thought regarding their form factor via his blog: http://prolost.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-should-movie-camera-look-like.html

I think that I would shoot with a camera like that - if it was affordable and delivered the look and file type that would be easy to work with - (sorry AVCHD is not looking to be that for me...) But I&#039;m also okay with being wrong - if I can be right when the cash needs to be on the table!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the Chicken &#038; Egg dynamic in full effect &#8211; but RED does have the API working in their favor &#8211; it seems that they have Avid (and eventually FCP) going to be able to cut R3D natively (eventually) and I agree one is point less and the other over priced (You decide which!)  I do however &#8211; really wish that they would at least acknowledge it in print. </p>
<p>I guess the really funny thing that came to me &#8211; is the reality that this is all in the hope that I can actually afford the Scarlet when it comes down the pipe. It would give me some sort of peace to know that I could cut it if I could afford it!  But with the shake up over at RED and these new camera (5DmkII and D90) coming of age &#8211; the only thing that is clear, &#8220;NAB IS GOING TO ROCK THIS YEAR!&#8221;  </p>
<p>PaulDV and I were talking before &#8220;Hero&#8217;s&#8221; started &#8211; Stu brings up some really good food for thought regarding their form factor via his blog: <a href="http://prolost.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-should-movie-camera-look-like.html" rel="nofollow">http://prolost.blogspot.com/2008/09/what-should-movie-camera-look-like.html</a></p>
<p>I think that I would shoot with a camera like that &#8211; if it was affordable and delivered the look and file type that would be easy to work with &#8211; (sorry AVCHD is not looking to be that for me&#8230;) But I&#8217;m also okay with being wrong &#8211; if I can be right when the cash needs to be on the table!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: creativeguys</title>
		<link>http://poweredproduction.com/tech/cs4-new-tapeless-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>creativeguys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://poweredproduction.com/?p=47#comment-5</guid>
		<description>RED is quiet because the rethink of Scarlet depends on Adobe providing a simple post workflow that is priced at the Scarlet end of the market. It&#039;s a bit chicken and egg between the 2 - Adobe wants the potentially vast Scarlet user group - RED wants people to be able to afford to edit .r3d (that almost precludes Apple as a decent Mac is priced 4x that of a PC)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RED is quiet because the rethink of Scarlet depends on Adobe providing a simple post workflow that is priced at the Scarlet end of the market. It&#8217;s a bit chicken and egg between the 2 &#8211; Adobe wants the potentially vast Scarlet user group &#8211; RED wants people to be able to afford to edit .r3d (that almost precludes Apple as a decent Mac is priced 4x that of a PC)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
